How we examine the decision
We create a criterion-by-criterion matrix linking the response, score and reasons. Formal procurement challenges can have exceptionally short deadlines and require specialist legal advice; a document review should never delay that referral.
Our review method
- Define the decision and deadline. We identify what was decided, by whom, when it took effect and which review, complaint or appeal route applies.
- Reconstruct the chronology. Events, documents and changes of position are placed in date order so the reasoning can be tested against what was known at the time.
- Map policy to evidence. Each relevant criterion is matched to the material relied on, material overlooked and explanation given.
- Separate the available routes. Administrative complaint, statutory review, appeal, regulator and Ombudsman routes are not treated as interchangeable.
- State the remedy. The final work identifies a proportionate outcome and the evidence supporting it.
Frequently asked questions
Can a low score be challenged?
A low score alone is not enough. The useful question is whether the scoring and reasons are consistent with the criteria and record.
Can I request moderation notes?
The available route depends on the procurement and information held. We can frame a focused request.
Do you conduct procurement litigation?
No. Court challenges and formal legal advice must be handled by an authorised procurement lawyer.