BSBLACK SHEEPCONSULTANTS
Menu

LIVE PUBLIC DECISION INTELLIGENCE

Decisions & Findings

What recent public decisions reveal about evidence, policy, complaint handling and practical remedies. Every analysis identifies the official source, decision date and reference.

Named sources. We link directly to the official publication.

No invented involvement. We say clearly when Black Sheep was not involved.

Practical value. Each article extracts an evidence lesson, not merely a summary.

NHS Wales · Waiting lists · 20 November 2025

NHS Wales waiting-time clock was reset without a documented clinical decision

Analysis of PSOW public interest report 202407678: Swansea Bay University Health Board wrongly reset a patient's treatment clock and failed to communicate the decision.

Read decision analysis →
SEND · Tribunal evidence · 4 August 2026

SEND Tribunal decision set aside after a material mistake about professional evidence

Analysis of AWZ v Hertfordshire County Council [2026] UKUT 301 (AAC): a mistaken finding about who assessed the child undermined the Tribunal's reasons.

Read decision analysis →
Benefits · Universal Credit · 7 August 2026

Fluctuating earnings should have been averaged: Upper Tribunal restores LCWRA

Analysis of GEA v SSWP [2026] UKUT 312 (AAC): the wrong earnings calculation interrupted the claimant's Universal Credit LCWRA element.

Read decision analysis →
FOI · Closed evidence · 11 August 2026

FOI appeals and closed evidence: the Tribunal must examine the case the requester cannot see

Analysis of Woodhouse v Information Commissioner [2026] UKUT 313 (AAC): inadequate reasoning on severance, prior public disclosure and closed material.

Read decision analysis →
FOI · Article 10 · 21 August 2026

The Tribunal found an information-rights breach—so why was disclosure still refused?

Analysis of Cruelty Free International v ICO and Home Office [2026] UKUT 328 (AAC): an Article 10 violation did not overcome a statutory disclosure prohibition.

Read decision analysis →
Housing · Homelessness · 24 February 2026

Council accepted temporary accommodation was unsuitable—but the family remained for more than two years

Analysis of LGSCO decision 25 006 066: Wandsworth accepted a studio was unsuitable but did not rehouse a mother and two children until September 2025.

Read decision analysis →
Housing · Damp and mould · 26 February 2026

Nineteen months of damp and mould—and a stage-two response that largely repeated stage one

Housing Ombudsman decision 202524778 found maladministration in Kingston Council's damp, mould and complaint handling, with £700 compensation ordered.

Read decision analysis →
Housing · Vulnerability · 31 March 2026

Damp, health concerns and delay: when should a landlord consider a temporary move?

Housing Ombudsman decision 202503830 found maladministration and service failure after delayed damp repairs and an inadequate response to a temporary accommodation request.

Read decision analysis →
Housing · Reasonable consideration · 11 May 2026

Damp and mould complaints must address household vulnerability—not merely list repair visits

Housing Ombudsman decision 202442752 found maladministration where repairs, communication, vulnerability, rehousing and damaged belongings were inadequately handled.

Read decision analysis →
FOI · Council information · 22 May 2026

A council cannot rely on “future publication” without satisfying the actual FOI test

ICO decision IC-413027-X9L4 rejected Wandsworth Council's reliance on FOIA section 22 for Access for All scheme information and required a fresh response.

Read decision analysis →
FOI · EIR · 8 May 2026

The information stayed withheld—but the council still breached the rules by using the wrong regime and responding late

ICO decision IC-398244-T6C3 found Rotherham Council could withhold requested material under EIR, but breached the refusal-notice requirements.

Read decision analysis →
Benefits · PIP appeal · 10 July 2026

Driving does not decide a PIP claim: Upper Tribunal overturns copy-and-paste reasons

Analysis of TM v SSWP [2026] UKUT 266 (AAC): inadequate reasons, an unfair paper determination and over-reliance on work and driving led to a fresh PIP hearing.

Read decision analysis →
Adult social care · Charging · 2 October 2025

Contradictory care-fee letters and a poorly managed transition to self-funding

Analysis of LGSCO decision 24 019 290 on adult social-care charging, contradictory letters, financial assessment and transition to self-funded care.

Read decision analysis →